In a significant legal decision, the Karnataka High Court has ruled that a sister cannot claim a job on compassionate grounds following her brother’s death. The verdict sets a precedent in matters related to employment on compassionate grounds in the state.
The case in question involved a woman who had applied for a government job on compassionate grounds after her brother, who was a government employee, passed away. She had sought employment under the compassionate appointment scheme, which is designed to provide financial assistance and employment opportunities to the immediate family members of deceased government employees.
However, the Karnataka High Court, in its judgment, held that the term “family” under the compassionate appointment scheme does not include siblings, such as sisters, and is limited to specific family members such as spouses, children, and parents.
Justice R. Devdas, who delivered the judgment, stated, “The policy of providing compassionate appointment is to support the immediate dependents of the deceased employee who have been deprived of their breadwinner. It is not intended to extend to siblings and other distant relatives.”
The court’s decision is based on the interpretation of the relevant rules and policies governing compassionate appointments in the state. It underscores the importance of adhering to the specific criteria established by government policies and rules when considering such appointments.
The ruling has prompted discussions among legal experts and advocates regarding the scope and limitations of compassionate appointment policies in Karnataka. While compassionate appointments are intended to provide support to grieving families, the court’s decision clarifies that the eligibility criteria are clearly defined and do not extend to all relatives.
This verdict also highlights the significance of legal clarity and adherence to established policies in matters related to government employment, ensuring that such appointments are made in accordance with established rules and regulations.
The case serves as a precedent for future cases involving claims for government employment on compassionate grounds, providing clarity on the eligibility criteria for such appointments in the state of Karnataka.
