Dr. T. S. Seema qualified with an MBBS degree in 2003 from the Government Medical College in Kozhikode. In pursuit of specialist credentials, she enrolled in a postgraduate diploma course in Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS), Nashik .
By 2011, she had secured registration with the Travancore–Cochin Medical Council—allegedly using the PG diploma certificate as proof of her qualification—and began her role as a junior consultant (O&G) at Cherthala Taluk Hospital and Karunagappally Headquarters Hospital, positions she held until the controversy emerged.
Allegations Surface and Suspension
In 2019, a patient whose child died at birth accused Dr. Seema of medical negligence. Following the complaint and subsequent Right to Information (RTI) inquiries, authorities determined that no student named T. S. Seema had ever passed the MUHS diploma exam in 2010, and that the certificate she presented carried a registration number issued to another student .
In May 2021, the Kerala health department suspended her, and the Travancore–Cochin Medical Council initiated proceedings to revoke her medical registration based on the forged credentials .
The Court Battle: Anticipatory Bail Plea Denied (July 2025)
In mid‑2025, Dr. Seema filed for anticipatory bail before the Kerala High Court, hoping to avoid arrest while contesting forgery and corruption charges. The court rejected her plea on July 26, 2025, underlining the gravity of the charges and ordering her to surrender immediately .
Charges Faced:
-
IPC Sections 417 (cheating), 465, 468, 471 (forgery-related offences)
-
Prevention of Corruption Act Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(a) (criminal misconduct)
Court’s Reasoning:
-
The court explicitly stated it was its duty in corruption cases to deny liberal relief to individuals accused of deceiving public institutions and citizens .
-
It rejected Seema’s argument that she was unaware of the certificate’s falsehood—pointing out that she had requested the return of her submitted documents in September 2010, an indication she knew she had failed the examination .
-
The prosecution presented a complaint from a couple alleging their infant’s death due to her supposed negligence, underscoring the serious implications of the case .
-
Given the nature of the offense and digital evidence involved, the court found custodial interrogation necessary to prevent evidence tampering or destruction .
Seema’s Defense and Claims
Dr. Seema asserted that:
-
Her husband, a surgeon at the district hospital in Kollam, had provided her the certificate—making her believe she had legitimately passed the exam.
-
She claimed the truth only came to light in 2021 after the case was filed. She then reappeared for the PG exam, passed it legitimately, and obtained a valid certificate.
The court, however, found these explanations insufficient and rejected her attempts to shift blame onto her husband, calling it implausible given her direct interest in the results as a medical professional .
Broader Impacts and Implications
This case highlights several key systemic concerns:
-
Credential verification gaps in government hiring processes that allowed a forged certificate to secure specialist positions for years.
-
The broader ethical and legal risks posed when professionals operate with unverified academic credentials.
-
The court’s firm stance reflects a wider judicial trend in India to treat corruption and forgery—especially when linked to public trust—with zero tolerance.
It also raises questions about internal hospital oversight, the effectiveness of medical councils in verifying credentials, and the responsibility of candidates to personally confirm their qualifications.
Where It Stands Now
-
Dr. Seema faces criminal prosecution for forgery, cheating, and misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
-
Legal proceedings are ongoing, and she remains unsheltered by anticipatory bail.
-
Suspension and potential revocation of her registration continue, pending disciplinary and criminal outcomes.
Key Takeaways
-
Integrity matters in healthcare: Patients trust medical professionals with their lives and expect ethical transparency.
-
The court’s approach: The Kerala High Court’s refusal of bail underlines its resolve not to allow those accused of public fraud to evade arrest.
-
Paper alone isn’t proof: A purported certificate is meaningless if not backed by official university records.
-
Long-term consequences: Even if one later qualifies legitimately, prior wrongdoing can leave a tarnished legacy and criminal liability.
Conclusion
The ordeal of Dr. T. S. Seema serves as a powerful case study in legal accountability and institutional responsibility. For over a decade, she functioned as a government gynecologist, yet complicity with—or ignorance of—a forged credential has led to her undoing. The courts were unambiguous: attempts to evade responsibility will not succeed. This episode should spark reflection across medical, academic, and regulatory institutions: credibility must be verified, not assumed.
Our Services – FACTS Transcripts
We at FACTS Transcripts assist in various services, including:
- Mark Sheet Transcripts
- E-Transcripts
- Duplicate Mark Sheets & Degree Certificates
- Medium of Instructions Certificates
- Attestations
- HRD Attestation / Apostille Services
- ECA (Educational Credentials Assessment)
Trusted by leading global verification organizations, including WES, IQAS, PEBC, NDEB, NASBA, CAPR, NZQA, ICAS, NCESS, ICES, ECE, eduPASS, ACEI, GCEUS, Comparative Education Services, NNAS, NCA, SAQA, QMAS, FORAC, Australian Pharmacy Council, and more.
FACTS Transcripts – The preferred choice for university document verification worldwide. We ensure a hassle-free process for obtaining your transcripts.
